Even if you're in a classroom or even in a party, an interesting discussion might end suddenly, with hurt or perhaps offended people and no one wiser for the exchange. Even if you may be really curious to understand and also study alternate opinions, you should first develop the ability of asking open ended questions. You can frequently find these on Bibles like Bibles for Children.
Well meaning individuals can destroy anyone's chances of learning more about a subject of social controversy, because they are lacking this ability. Effective as well as careful use of unsupported claims, coupled with an open ended question technique, can open the door to a lively and also in depth conversation where everyone can take advantage.
For instance, suppose you are at a social gathering, eager to meet new as well as interesting people. Debatable subjects tend to be, on some degree, delicate in nature. You have family members in the breakaway state of Russia and so have some other views of the reality of the current Russian presence. You start a conversation with a history professor using the this remark. "I think it is just horrible the way the Russians sent troops into Georgia, killing civilian people! What do you think?"
If you don't know the disposition or perhaps sentiments of that professor, you might have put your foot in your mouth. You have started the discussion by proclaiming your bias in advance. What if that professor is a Russian immigrant, with strong reactions on the Russian position? You've basically divested yourself of understanding some valuable historical facts that might shed some light on the situation. If this educated person takes offense, the discussion could be short and uninformative.
On the other hand, granted the same scenario, posing an open ended question does not suggest disagreement or bias on your behalf. You can ask, "You happen to be a history professor and I was curious to learn more about the matter in the Georgian conflict. What is behind this?"
This alternate strategy doesn't state your perspective, except one of ignorance. Although the professor may have a bias, she or he will not think of you being an enemy and will be flattered that you appreciate what they already know. It's unimportant whether this individual concurs with you. The target is to learn what they think and also know, how they reached their conclusions and grow more educated in the process.
An additional example of the open ended topic, utilized in a strictly social context might concern a debatable movie. "Have you watched Michael Moore's 'Sicko'? I believe that guy's a nut and disgracefully unpatriotic, right?" You have expressed your point, leaving anybody you are questioning in a potentially awkward lurch. Not many people of the opposite perspective is going to be impolite adequately enough to tell you off. A further loss to your account!
Why don't you consider, "Have you seen 'Sicko'? I'm having thoughts regarding his take on the medical situation. It's getting a lot of push." These cases on the utilization of open ended questions can be a bit heavy handed, but intentionally so. You can see the need for learning, without offending.
Well meaning individuals can destroy anyone's chances of learning more about a subject of social controversy, because they are lacking this ability. Effective as well as careful use of unsupported claims, coupled with an open ended question technique, can open the door to a lively and also in depth conversation where everyone can take advantage.
For instance, suppose you are at a social gathering, eager to meet new as well as interesting people. Debatable subjects tend to be, on some degree, delicate in nature. You have family members in the breakaway state of Russia and so have some other views of the reality of the current Russian presence. You start a conversation with a history professor using the this remark. "I think it is just horrible the way the Russians sent troops into Georgia, killing civilian people! What do you think?"
If you don't know the disposition or perhaps sentiments of that professor, you might have put your foot in your mouth. You have started the discussion by proclaiming your bias in advance. What if that professor is a Russian immigrant, with strong reactions on the Russian position? You've basically divested yourself of understanding some valuable historical facts that might shed some light on the situation. If this educated person takes offense, the discussion could be short and uninformative.
On the other hand, granted the same scenario, posing an open ended question does not suggest disagreement or bias on your behalf. You can ask, "You happen to be a history professor and I was curious to learn more about the matter in the Georgian conflict. What is behind this?"
This alternate strategy doesn't state your perspective, except one of ignorance. Although the professor may have a bias, she or he will not think of you being an enemy and will be flattered that you appreciate what they already know. It's unimportant whether this individual concurs with you. The target is to learn what they think and also know, how they reached their conclusions and grow more educated in the process.
An additional example of the open ended topic, utilized in a strictly social context might concern a debatable movie. "Have you watched Michael Moore's 'Sicko'? I believe that guy's a nut and disgracefully unpatriotic, right?" You have expressed your point, leaving anybody you are questioning in a potentially awkward lurch. Not many people of the opposite perspective is going to be impolite adequately enough to tell you off. A further loss to your account!
Why don't you consider, "Have you seen 'Sicko'? I'm having thoughts regarding his take on the medical situation. It's getting a lot of push." These cases on the utilization of open ended questions can be a bit heavy handed, but intentionally so. You can see the need for learning, without offending.
No comments:
Post a Comment